CHEMICALS: A NEGLECTED AREA

If genes and lifestyles are really to blame for cancer in humans, then why was cancer such a rare disease in pre-industrial societies?

 

Dr Albert Schweitzer, the celebrated humanitarian, wrote that, 'on my arrival in Gabon in 1913 I was astonished to encounter no case of cancer... I can not, of course, say positively that there was no cancer at all, but like other frontier doctors, I can only say that if any cases existed they must have been quite rare'. An Alaskan doctor reported that in his thirty-six years of practice he had never seen a case of malignant disease among the truly primitive Eskimos and Indians although it occurred frequently when they become modernised. Since 1840, similar findings have been reported by doctors for native people throughout the world.

As Dr. Schenk observed, 'it is the nature and essence of industrial civilisation to be toxic in every sense. We are faced with the grim prospect that the advance of cancer and of civilisation parallel each other.' In 1960, Professor Rene Dubois wrote that, 'certain diseases such as dental caries, arteriosclerosis and cancers are so uncommon among certain primitive peoples as to remain unnoticed - at least as long as nothing is changed in the ancestral way of life'.

Clearly, something about our industrial way of life changed all that. Like heart disease, diabetes and obesity, cancer is primarily a disease of civilization.

> Our Toxic World